home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0334>
- <title>
- Mar. 21, 1994: The Arts & Media:Television
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Mar. 21, 1994 Hard Times For Hillary
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE ARTS & MEDIA, Page 77
- Television
- Manson Family Values
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Diane Sawyer revisits the notorious mass-murder case as the
- network prime-time news shows go crazy for crime
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Zoglin
- </p>
- <p> Charles Manson was, as usual, a satanic spellbinder, giving
- enigmatic nonanswers and snarling at interviewer Diane Sawyer:
- "I'm a gangster, woman!" Two former members of his "family,"
- Patricia Krenwinkel and Leslie Van Houten, were, by contrast,
- rational and remorseful. "I stabbed him with a fork repeatedly
- and eventually left the fork in him," said Krenwinkel, describing
- her part in the Tate-La Bianca murders. "I don't believe any
- of us had any concept of really what we were doing."
- </p>
- <p> Even for the increasingly sensational network magazine shows,
- the ghoulish display last week was something of a milestone.
- In addition to the Manson hour--the first weekly episode of
- ABC's new Turning Point series--serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer
- and his father were brought together for a session on Dateline
- NBC. CBS's 48 Hours spent another hour exploring the case of
- Russell Obremski, convicted of two Oregon murders in 1969 and
- recently freed on parole. And NBC's Now served up its own creepy
- sociopath: a man in prison for kidnapping untold numbers of
- children from their bed and doing "unspeakable things" to them.
- </p>
- <p> Unspeakable is how some were describing the state of network
- news. TV reviewers were righteously appalled that ABC would
- dredge up the Manson horrors once again. Producers at all three
- networks were privately embarrassed at the confluence of crime
- stories. The warden at the Columbia Correctional Institution
- in Wisconsin was fed up; he banned future interviews for Dahmer,
- who has already talked to Inside Edition and ABC's Day One and
- had Sally Jessy Raphael next in line.
- </p>
- <p> Not that it deterred viewers. The Manson show drew a smashing
- 18.1 rating (meaning 18.1% of all U.S. TV homes were tuned in),
- which will probably land it in the weekly Top 10. The Dahmer
- episode of Dateline (which also included a teary Nancy Kerrigan
- interview) got a 15.3 rating, the show's highest ever. Undoubtedly,
- the crime wave will continue--and network news producers will
- continue to grit their teeth and hope their old journalism-school
- teachers aren't watching.
- </p>
- <p> The Manson show seemed to crystallize the dilemma. At a press
- conference, ABC News president Roone Arledge described the in-house
- debate over whether to launch Turning Point with the Manson
- show or with another, softer program about a couple who gave
- birth to sextuplets. Picking Manson, said Arledge with unusual
- candor, was a matter of "pragmatism"--a way to draw immediate
- attention to the new series.
- </p>
- <p> ABC executives defended the Manson show, pointing out that Krenwinkel
- and Van Houten had not been interviewed since their murder convictions
- in 1971. "If TIME magazine or the New York Times had a chance
- to do the first interview in 25 years with the Manson girls,
- would they turn it down?" asked ABC News vice president Joanna
- Bistany. Probably not. But at a time when the network newsmagazines
- are close to being overrun by tabloid sensationalism, introducing
- a new show by recycling the most notorious murder case of the
- past 30 years is hardly a reassuring sign.
- </p>
- <p> The problem, of course, is that prime-time news shows must compete
- for ratings just as Home Improvement and L.A. Law do. "We could
- do an hour on Whitewater, but we wouldn't survive," says Now
- executive producer Jeff Zucker. "If I don't do at least some
- of these true-crime stories, I won't be doing anything." Andrew
- Heyward, executive producer of CBS's Eye to Eye, is worried
- that the similar impulses of these shows will ultimately turn
- viewers off. "To the degree that we all chase the same surefire
- stories," he says, "we'll stand out less and less."
- </p>
- <p> To be sure, these shows are more objectionable in the mass than
- individually. Sawyer's interview with the Manson women, despite
- a couple of squishy moments ("The homecoming princess who sang
- in the church choir--remember her?"), was relatively restrained
- and undeniably compelling. Stone Phillips was less circumspect
- with Dahmer ("Was it the killing that excited you, or is it
- what happened after the killing?") but didn't pander needlessly.
- </p>
- <p> Both shows recognized that viewers are fascinated with these
- stories less for the gory crime details than for the peek they
- provide into the extremes of human psychology. We watch to be
- reassured these people are monsters, not at all like you and
- me. And to face the fear that in some basic ways they are exactly
- like you and me. Krenwinkel and Van Houten today could be mistaken
- for high-school English teachers. Even Manson had a rare moment
- of recognizable humanity. Shown a videotape of Krenwinkel, whom
- he had not seen in nearly 25 years, he turned from the screen
- and offered one sincere, poignant response. "She got old on
- me," he said.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-